|
Calculating
ROI for Buying New Technology
(January 25, 2002)
|
 |
By
Richard N. Tooker
Any
company contemplating the purchase of
technology to drive database marketing
or customer relationship management
initiatives usually faces the need to
cost-justify the investment. In this
situation, the data that go into the
return on investment calculation falls
into four general areas.
Cost.
This
is the total cost of buying/licensing
the technology and deploying it. It
should include the cost of personnel
that will be dedicated to the use of the
technology, fully weighted, unless they
are already on staff. This will, of
course, be the easiest number to get
your hands around. In most cases,
companies will amortize any initial or
extraordinary
setup/licensing/installation costs over
the life of the vendor contract, but
generally not longer than three years.
Process
Improvement Savings. Many companies spend an enormous amount of marketing
department time in the give-and-take of
deciding what to do. New technologies
should make that a much more efficient
process. Marketing people should spend
less actual time in those pursuits, and
fully weighted hourly costs should
produce significant dollar savings.
Of
course, this has to be balanced against
the cost of any additional personnel you
might plan to hire to work with the
technologies. Still, the savings should
be significant.
One
other factor to consider in process
improvement is the benefit of quality
assurance. If you have real examples of
programs that did not work because of
quality control problems (mailed to
wrong people, late execution, etc.) and
can put a dollar cost on those problems,
it might be reasonable to assume that
your new technology will save you money
because you will not incur those
problems going forward.
Information
technology savings. If your marketing people will be doing segmentation
and extracts using the technology, that
will free up personnel and machine time
in information technology. Often, this
benefit alone is enough to cost-justify
an investment in new technologies,
especially if you (like many companies)
have interdepartmental billing.
Over
the course of my career, I have seen
many instances in which IT has purposely
inflated intercompany billing costs to
shift budget dollars to other
departments. As a result, the
intercompany savings in marketing are
enough to buy the technology without
including any other revenue sources.
Assuming those in your IT department
have not done that, though, you can
still ask them for an accounting of the
machine and people time they are
expending on your behalf that will be
obviated by the deployment of your new
technology. If you properly weight that
time to include benefits and share of
general/administrative expenses, it is
usually a very significant number.
Time
to market. Aside
from the obvious benefit of addressing
competitive pressures, getting to the
marketplace more quickly with new
initiatives produces real revenue. Let's
say you have a new product to launch
that you expect to generate an average
monthly revenue stream of $100,000. If
you can get it to market 45 days faster,
then there would be a $150,000 revenue
bump at launch that you would not have
gotten any other way.
And
if faster time to market allows you to
implement more programs over the course
of a year than you would be able to
otherwise, you might be able to
logically include all the revenue from
one or more additional programs in your
calculation. If you want to make that a
believable benefit, though, you need to
show historical examples of programs you
had to abandon or delay significantly
because you did not have the technology
to get them done on a timely basis.
In
addition to the hard numbers in the four
factors above, there is the additional
benefit of basic empowerment. Having
this technology will allow you to do
some things you would not be able to do
otherwise, at any cost. Quite often,
companies justify their entire
investment based on there being no other
way to do the things they have to do to
take their business to the next level.
There is a hard-dollar benefit to this,
of course, but it is somewhat harder to
quantify.
You
have to put a dollar figure on what it
is worth to you to be able to implement
better targeted communications and/or
customer dialogues, more frequently and
efficiently; but of course you cannot
test to arrive at that figure until and
unless you make the investment.
The
empowerment factor is hard to quantify.
The best bet might be to say you think
it is reasonable to assume it will allow
you to generate incremental revenue in
the "X" percent range, if you
need dollars from this benefit to make
your ROI calculation work. But if you do
that, keep the percentage small -- less
than 1 percent. Otherwise, your chief
financial officer might consider it
padding.
Copyright
©
DM News 2002 All Rights Reserved
|